On October 27, 1553 John Calvin, the founder of Calvinism, had Michael Servetus, the Spanish physician, burned at the stake just outside Geneva for his doctrinal heresies.[1] John Calvin, the originator of the popular doctrine of “once saved, always saved” (known in certain circles as “the perseverance of the saints”) violated the cry of the Reformation — “sola Scriptura” — by murdering a doctrinal “heretic” without scriptural justification. The killing of Servetus was something Calvin had planned long before Servetus was even captured. Calvin wrote to his friend Farel on February 13, 1546 (seven years prior to Servetus’ arrest). He went on record as saying: “If he [Servetus] comes to Geneva, I shall never let him go out alive if my authority has weight.”[2] Evidently, in that day Calvin’s authority in Geneva, Switzerland had ultimate “weight.” This is why some referred to Geneva as the “Rome of Protestantism”[3] and to Calvin as the Protestant “Pope of Geneva.”[4]
During Servetus’ trial, Calvin wrote: “I hope that the verdict will call for the death penalty.”[5] All this reveals a side of John Calvin that is not known and hardly appealing, to say the least! Obviously he had a prolonged, murderous hate in his heart and was willing to violate Scripture to put another to death and in a most cruel way. Although Calvin consented to Servetus’ request to be beheaded [thought to be better than being burned alive], he acquiesced in the mode of execution employed. But why did Calvin have a death wish for Servetus? “To rescue Servetus from his heresies, Calvin replied with the latest edition of his Institutes of the Christian Religion, which Servetus promptly returned with insulting marginal comments. Despite Servetus’ pleas, Calvin, who developed an intense dislike of Servetus during their correspondence, refused to return any of the incriminating material.”[6]
“Convicted of heresy by the Roman Catholic authorities, Servetus escaped the death penalty by a prison break. Heading for Italy, Servetus unaccountablystoppedat Geneva, where he had been denounced by Calvin and the Reformers. He was seizedthe day after his arrival, condemned as a heretic when he refused to recant,and burned in 1553 with the tacit approval of Calvin.”[7]
“In the course of his flight from Vienne, Servetus stopped in Geneva and made themistake of attending a sermon by Calvin. He was recognized and arrested aftertheservice.”[8] “Calvin had him [Servetus] arrested as a heretic, Convicted andburned to death.”[9]
Let it be noted that those responsible for burning Servetus in Geneva put half-green wood around the feet of the victim and a wreath strewn with sulfur on his head. It took over thirty minutes to render him lifeless in such a fire, while the people of Geneva stood around to watch him suffer and slowly die! Just before this happened, the record shows:
“Farel walked beside the condemned man, and kept up a constant barrage ofwords, in complete insensitivity to what Servetus might be feeling. All he had in mindwas to extort from the prisoner an acknowledgment of his theological error[which readers of this magazine know was not an error at all but Jesus’ own truth about GOD] — a shocking example of the soulless cure of souls. After some minutes of this, Servetus ceased making any reply and prayed quietly to himself. When they arrived at the place of execution, Farel announced to the watching crowd:
‘Here you see what power Satan possesses when he has a man in his power. This man is a scholar of distinction, and he perhaps believed he was acting rightly. But now Satan possesses him completely, as he might possess you, should you fall into his traps.’ [Well did Jesus say, “Those who kill you will think that they are doing God a service”!]
“When the executioner began his work, Servetus whispered with trembling voice: ‘Oh God, Oh God!’ The thwarted Farel snapped at him: ‘Have you nothing else to say?’ This time Servetus replied to him: ‘What else might I do, but speak of God!’ Thereupon he was lifted onto the pyre and chained to the stake. A wreath strewn with sulfur was placed on his head. When the faggots were ignited, a piercing cry of horror broke from him. ‘Mercy, mercy!’ he cried. For more than half an hour the horrible agony continued, for the pyre had been made of half-green wood, which burned slowly. ‘Jesus, Son of the eternal God, have mercy on me,’ the tormented man cried from the midst of the flames.”[11]
“Calvin had thus murdered his enemy, and there is nothing to suggest that he ever repented of his crime. The next year he published a defense in which further insults were heaped upon his former adversary in most vindictive and intemperate language.”[13]
“As an ‘obstinate heretic’ he had all his property confiscated without more ado. He was badly treated in prison. It is understandable, therefore, that Servetus was rude and insulting at his confrontation with Calvin. Unfortunately for him, at this time Calvin was fighting to maintain his weakening power in Geneva. Calvin's opponents used Servetus as a pretext for attacking the Geneva Reformer’s theocratic government. It became a matter of prestige — always the sore point for any dictatorial regime — for Calvin to assert his power in this respect. He was forced to push the condemnation of Servetus with all the means at his command.”[15]
“Ironically enough, the execution of Servetus did not really bolster the strength of the Geneva Reformation. On the contrary, as Fritz Barth has indicated, it ‘gravely compromised Calvinism and put into the hands of the Catholics, to whom Calvin wanted to demonstrate his Christian orthodoxy, the very best weapon for the persecution of the Huguenots, who were nothing but heretics in their eyes.’ The procedure against Servetus served as a model of a Protestant heretic trial…It differed in no respect from the methods of the medieval Inquisition…The victoriousReformation, too, was unable to resist the temptations of power.”[16]
Let us illustrate this another way. Suppose a man from your congregation with a reputation for being a spiritual leader captured your neighbor’s dog, chained it to a stake, then used a small amount of green kindling to slowly burn the dog to death. What would you think of such a person, especially if he afterwards showed no remorse? Would you want him to interpret the Bible for you? To make the matter even worse for John Calvin, a person, unlike a dog, is created in the image of God! Like it or not, we can only conclude from this evidence that John Calvin’s heart was darkened, and not enlightened, as a result of his murderous hate for Servetus. At best, Calvin was spiritually blinded by this hate and therefore, spiritually hindered from rightly expounding the word of truth.[17] At worst, which was apparently the case, John Calvin himself was unsaved, according to Scripture:
“But the cowardly, the unbelieving, the vile, the murderers, the sexually immoral, those who practice magic arts, the idolaters and all liars — their place will be in the fiery lake of burning sulfur. This is the second death” (Rev. 21:8).
“We know that we have come to know him if we obey his commands. The man who says, ‘I know him,’ but does not do what he commands is a liar and the truth is not in him” (1 Jn. 2:3-4).
“And you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding [continuing] in him” (1 Jn. 3:15, NKJV).
Dear reader, since murderers are unsaved and John Calvin was a murderer, then Calvin was unsaved! Moreover, since the unsaved are darkened in their spiritual understanding (Eph. 4:18) and Calvin was unsaved based on Scripture, then was not Calvin darkened in his spiritual understanding? Jesus said we can “know” people by their fruit (Matt. 12:33) — be it John Calvin or anyone else! Similarly, the Apostle John wrote:
“This is how we know who the children of God are and who the children of the Devil are: Anyone who does not do what is right is not a child of God; nor is anyone who does not love his brother” (1 Jn. 3:10).
No other evidence is needed to objectively assess Calvin’s spiritual status. However, two other men should also be briefly mentioned:
Two other famous episodes concerned Jacques Gruet and Jerome Bolsec. Gruet, whom Calvin considered a Libertine, had written letters critical of the Consistory and, more serious,
petitioned the Catholic king of France to intervene in the political and religious affairs of Geneva. With Calvin’s concurrence he was beheaded for treason. Bolsec publicly challenged Calvin’s teaching on predestination, a doctrine Bolsec, with many others, found morally repugnant. Banished from the city in 1551, he revenged himself in 1577 by publishing a biography of Calvin that charged him with greed, financial misconduct, and sexual aberration.”[18]
How should a heretic or any false teacher be dealt with, that is, if one is willing to abide by the biblical guidelines? Paul wrote Titus and touched upon this very issue, which first starts out as a qualification for eldership in the church:
“He [the elder] must hold firmly to the trustworthy message as it has been taught, so that he can encourage others by sound doctrine and refute those who oppose it. For there are many rebellious people, mere talkers and deceivers, especially those of the circumcision group. They must be silenced, because they are ruining whole households by teaching things they ought not to teach, and that for the sake of dishonest gain” (Titus 1:9-11).
If Calvin’s example is the standard, the next time the Jehovah’s Witnesses or Mormon missionaries come to our door, we should physically overpower them, bind them to a stake, and make human candles out of them. Can you imagine a professing Christian doing this, much less a reputed theologian? If done, could you force yourself to believe such a person was truly saved and adhere to his unique doctrinal distinctives?
Also, false teachers should be openly named as Paul openly named Hymenaeus and Philetus who were destroying the faith of some of the Christians whom Paul knew: “Their teaching will spread like gangrene. Among them are Hymenaeus and Philetus, who have wandered away from the truth. They say that the resurrection has already taken place, and they destroy the faith of some” (2 Tim. 2:17-18).
Why did Calvin grossly violate these scriptural guidelines? Since Paul’s holy spirit-inspired directives (and example) regarding how to deal with a heretic were diametrically opposed by Calvin, isn’t it safe to assume that Calvin was governed by a different spirit than Paul had? Moreover, why have these facts about John Calvin’s life rarely been mentioned in our day? The answer to this last question is obvious. They are both an embarrassment and refutation of Calvinists who proudly refer to themselves by his name! Since they are the evangelical majority and it is their power and influence that has the greatest sway over what is disseminated throughout our land and even the world, this information about their founder is seldom, if ever, heard. Many people are only now learning the shocking facts about Calvinism’s founder as they read them for the first time!
“No event has more influenced history’s judgment of Calvin than the role he played in the capture and execution of the Spanish physician and amateur theologian Michael Servetus in 1553. This event has overshadowed everything else Calvin accomplished and continues to embarrass his modern admirers.”[19]
Three important questions remain: (1) Can John Calvin be scripturally justified for murdering Michael Servetus? (2) Does a murderous hate, according to Scripture, render one spiritually unable to accurately interpret the Scriptures? (3) Can a murderer be saved according to Revelation 21:8?
All these answers have a bearing on the credibility of Calvin’s popular “perseverance of the saints” doctrine, among others. Regretfully, Calvin’s version of Christianity is the prevalent view in our land, but is his view Scriptural? To answer in the affirmative is to say that Calvin’s double predestination is true, that is, some are predestined for Heaven [Heaven in the Bible is nowhere the destination of the saved — ed.] and others are predestined for Hell without free choice on their part![20] This would violate many Scriptures, especially 2 Peter 3:9: “The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. He is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance.”
Furthermore, Calvin’s teachings declare Jesus’ work on the cross was not infinite, because according to that teaching, he did not shed his blood for every human, but only for the elect — those predestined to be saved. This is clearly refuted by 1 John 2:2: “He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world.”
Also, his “perseverance of the saints” doctrine would assert that God’s power will keep a truly saved person secure, in spite of grievous sins committed after regeneration and/or any doctrinal heresies that would be embraced, thus violating many scriptural examples and warnings which prove the opposite!
It should be apparent that, from the founder down to us today, the “perseverance of the saints” doctrine (most commonly known as “once saved always saved”) has often been a “license for immorality” taught under the banner of grace (see Jude 3, 4). As Calvin’s own theology allowed for his actions against Servetus, many in our day are sexually immoral, liars, drunkards, filled with greed, etc., while they profess salvation. This is a ramification of Calvin’s perverted grace message — a teaching which has “spread like gangrene” from a man who could openly burn another to death and for the remaining 10 years and seven months of his life, never publicly repent of his crime.
“Servetus’ ashes will cry out against him [Calvin] as long as the names of these two men are known in the world.”[21]
Responses to this article from www.evangelicaloutreach.org/ashes.htm:
“One year ago, while taking a European History class, I chose to do a final project on the Reformer John Calvin. After gathering all the facts I could find in books, I turned to the Internet for the latest information. What I found was an article titled, ‘His Ashes Cry out Against John Calvin.’ Shortly after reading it, I changed my topic from John Calvin to Michael Servetus. Interested by this story and seeing much of your information came from Bainton’s book Hunted Heretic, I searched madly for a copy through used bookstores, for about a year. One day, I received a letter that I might purchase a copy for a not-so-high amount, and amazingly the copy was signed by Bainton himself. I’m back at this web site, scratching up information for a friend on his report on Calvin. The whole point of this is that I would just like to thank you for giving me a brand new point of view on John Calvin. This web site has one thing that many don’t, and that is credibility. Thanks again.”
“On Monday I received a phone call from the chairman of the board of the church I pastor. Brother Phil was upset some of his fellow Christian school board members were pestering him about not being a Calvinist. They were saying his simple Bible believing faith was naive and he needed to study John Calvin to understand what it means to be saved. He asked me for help. Well, I had long ago in college studied Calvin and decided his position on predestination was not in line with the clear teaching of Scripture. I had two funerals to do this week and no time to prepare anything. But I located your work ‘His Ashes Cry Out Against John Calvin’ on the internet. I read this work word for word to the men's Sunday School class and the reaction was universal: They all exclaimed: Who needs a murderer to teach Bible doctrine? Thank the Lord that your article ‘His Ashes Cry Out Against John Calvin’ headed off a very divisive issue. I am waiting to hear what the school board members think when they read ‘His Ashes Cry Out Against John Calvin’! Again, thank you.”
FOOTNOTES.
[1] “On only two counts, significantly, was Servetus condemned — namely, anti-Trinitarianism and anti-paedobaptism [infant baptism]” (Roland H. Bainton, Hunted Heretic, The Beacon Press, 1953, p. 207). Comment: Regarding his rejection of infant baptism, Servetus said, “It is an invention of the Devil, an infernal falsity for the destruction of all Christianity” (Ibid., p. 186.) Many Christians of our day could only give a hearty “Amen” to this statement made about infant baptism. However, this is why, in part, Servetus was condemned to death by the Calvinists!
[2] Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge, Baker Book House, 1950, p. 371.
[3] The Wycliffe Biographical Dictionary of the Church, Moody Press, 1982, p. 73.
[4] Stephen Hole Fritchman, Men of Liberty, reissued Kennikat Press, Inc., 1968, p. 8.
[5] Walter Nigg, The Heretics, Alfred A. Knopf, 1962, p. 328.
[6] Who's Who In Church History, Fleming H. Revell Company, 1969, p. 252.
[7] Steven Ozment, The Age Of Reformation 1250-1550, Yale University Press, 1980, p. 370.
[8] The Heretics, p. 326.
[9] The Wycliffe Biographical Dictionary of the Church, p. 366.
[10] John F. Fulton, Michael Servetus Humanist and Martyr, Herbert Reichner, 1953, p. 35.
[11] The Heretics, p. 327.
[12] Hunted Heretic, p. 214. Comment: Nowhere in the Bible do we see this sort of emphasis for one’s salvation. The dying thief, the Philippian jailer and Cornelius were all saved by a most basic trusting-submitting faith in Jesus.
[13] Michael Servetus Humanist and Martyr, p. 36.
[14] John Hus attacked various Roman Catholic heresies such as transubstantiation, subservience to the Pope, belief in the saints, efficacy of absolution through the priesthood, unconditional obedience to earthly rulers and simony. Hus also made the Holy Scriptures the only rule in matters of religion and faith. See The Wycliffe Biographical Dictionary of the Church, p. 201.
[15] The Heretics, p. 326.
[16] Ibid., pp. 328, 329.
[17] For example, in clear contrast to the meaning that Jesus gave of the parable of the weeds in the field (Mt. 13:24-43) where the Lord told us “the field is the world” (v. 38), John Calvin taught “the field is the church.” See Calvin’s verse by verse commentary on Matthew’s gospel.
[18] The Age of Reformation 1250-1550, pp. 368,369. Bolsec's book in which he charges Calvin as he did is cited as Histoire de la vie, moeurs, actes, doctrine, constance et mort de Jean Calvin,. pub. a Lyon en 1577, ed. M. Louis-Francois Chastel (Lyon, 1875).
[19] Ibid., p. 369.
[20] Augustine of Hippo, the Catholic theologian, was an earlier proponent of predestination from whom John Calvin drew ideas.
[21] The Heretics, p. 328.
2 comments:
Post a Comment